Logic is ghastly and not friendly to Muses or a Muses
Attempting to fathom logic (log ick ),which my Muse and I find horribly ghastly , we found ourselves wishing to run as rapidly as possible from the inferno of a land where no subtle alchemy or wisdom seems to reign or even to inhabit, a very bad habit, wethinks........
not ventured anynowhere near logic. The muse screams no no no no no no noo nooooooo.
Do any of your muses think logic is a good thing. Do any of you?
In order to let me read what is below, where the colored underlined words took us to w
i c k i pedia.....she wants to type wicked . in stead of wickopedia.........my goodness...or not.
In logic, NO THING IS LOGICAL an argument SEE WE ARE ARGUING ALREADY is a set of one or more meaningful declarative sentences WHO SAYS (or "propositions")SEE THEY HAVE TO PROPOSITION THEY CAN'T SUGGEST known as the premises PREMISES ARE WHERE PEOPLE LIVE BEFORE THEY ARE EFICTED ADDICTED OR EXTINCT along with another meaningful declarative sentence THIS IS SO NOT INTERESTING..IF IT WAS IMPORTANT IT WOULD BE INTERESTING. (or "proposition") known as the conclusion. THE CONCLUSION IS PREMATURE....AND THEN IT IS VERY HARD TO READ ANYMORE, LET ALONG OR ALONE TO SEE WHY THIS MIGHT BE VALID OR INVALID...DOES INVALID MEAN THE SAME THING AS SOMEONE WHO IS SICK INVALID? PROBABLLY. ALL THE WORDS ARE BLURRING AND EVEN CONJURING NEW WORK SEEMS PREFERABLE TO THIS. A deductive argument asserts that the truth of the conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises; an inductive argument asserts that the truth of the conclusion is supported by the premises. Deductive
DOES THIS HAPPEN TO YOU WHEN YOU TRY TO FATHOM LOGIC?
arguments are valid or invalid, and sound or not sound.THIS IS SO NOT TRURE OR EVEN TURE OR TRUE...WOW...The Muse is not pleased, not A WEE BIT. LIKE HER LIFE IS TREATENED..IS IT? An argument is valid if and only if the truth of the conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises and (consequently) its corresponding conditional is a necessary truth. A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises.
Each premise and the conclusion are only either true or false, i.e. are truth bearers. The sentences composing an argument are referred to as being either true or false, not as being valid or invalid; deductive arguments are referred to as being valid or invalid, not as being true or false.THIS MAKES NO..........SENSE......IT IS NOT POETIC OR PLEASURABLE OR PERTINENT..IT IS VERY IMPERTINENT AND PERSNICKITY AND PERNICIOUS AND POSSIBLY POISONOUS TOO Some authors refer to the premises and conclusion using the terms declarative sentence, I DECLARE NO LOGIC UNDER PENALTLY OF DEATH...I'M GOING TO HAVE TO MISSPELL MORE THAN EVER BEFORE AS AN ANTIDOTE TO ALL THIS GHASTLINESS. statement, proposition, sentence, or even indicative utterance. The reason for the variety is concern about the ontological significance of the terms, proposition in particular. Whichever term is used, each premise and the conclusion must be capable of being true or false and nothing else: they are truthbearers.
_________________
Aisling aka Laurel
http://www.symbolicbridging.com/
http://www.aislingnano.wordpress.com/Back to top
not ventured anynowhere near logic. The muse screams no no no no no no noo nooooooo.
Do any of your muses think logic is a good thing. Do any of you?
In order to let me read what is below, where the colored underlined words took us to w
i c k i pedia.....she wants to type wicked . in stead of wickopedia.........my goodness...or not.
In logic, NO THING IS LOGICAL an argument SEE WE ARE ARGUING ALREADY is a set of one or more meaningful declarative sentences WHO SAYS (or "propositions")SEE THEY HAVE TO PROPOSITION THEY CAN'T SUGGEST known as the premises PREMISES ARE WHERE PEOPLE LIVE BEFORE THEY ARE EFICTED ADDICTED OR EXTINCT along with another meaningful declarative sentence THIS IS SO NOT INTERESTING..IF IT WAS IMPORTANT IT WOULD BE INTERESTING. (or "proposition") known as the conclusion. THE CONCLUSION IS PREMATURE....AND THEN IT IS VERY HARD TO READ ANYMORE, LET ALONG OR ALONE TO SEE WHY THIS MIGHT BE VALID OR INVALID...DOES INVALID MEAN THE SAME THING AS SOMEONE WHO IS SICK INVALID? PROBABLLY. ALL THE WORDS ARE BLURRING AND EVEN CONJURING NEW WORK SEEMS PREFERABLE TO THIS. A deductive argument asserts that the truth of the conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises; an inductive argument asserts that the truth of the conclusion is supported by the premises. Deductive
DOES THIS HAPPEN TO YOU WHEN YOU TRY TO FATHOM LOGIC?
arguments are valid or invalid, and sound or not sound.THIS IS SO NOT TRURE OR EVEN TURE OR TRUE...WOW...The Muse is not pleased, not A WEE BIT. LIKE HER LIFE IS TREATENED..IS IT? An argument is valid if and only if the truth of the conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises and (consequently) its corresponding conditional is a necessary truth. A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises.
Each premise and the conclusion are only either true or false, i.e. are truth bearers. The sentences composing an argument are referred to as being either true or false, not as being valid or invalid; deductive arguments are referred to as being valid or invalid, not as being true or false.THIS MAKES NO..........SENSE......IT IS NOT POETIC OR PLEASURABLE OR PERTINENT..IT IS VERY IMPERTINENT AND PERSNICKITY AND PERNICIOUS AND POSSIBLY POISONOUS TOO Some authors refer to the premises and conclusion using the terms declarative sentence, I DECLARE NO LOGIC UNDER PENALTLY OF DEATH...I'M GOING TO HAVE TO MISSPELL MORE THAN EVER BEFORE AS AN ANTIDOTE TO ALL THIS GHASTLINESS. statement, proposition, sentence, or even indicative utterance. The reason for the variety is concern about the ontological significance of the terms, proposition in particular. Whichever term is used, each premise and the conclusion must be capable of being true or false and nothing else: they are truthbearers.
_________________
Aisling aka Laurel
http://www.symbolicbridging.com/
http://www.aislingnano.wordpress.com/Back to top
posted by larkin at 12:12 PM
<< Home